i
their endeavours was to be attritrited to my interfering
with their part in the case. I
I guaranted him that
the action would be withdrawn at Canton and-
Consequently
the
prisoner released by the Chinese Magistrate if either Chum shum through W. Demys
would and could prove before
me, that the action.
against him
was
unfounded,
of a
private settlement
I of the parties could be arrived at, or the amount of
wvere
the claim, fees of Court and lawyer Chun shum in the Court of Hongkong.
that this security
deposited by I added
necessary beffore going to law
we n
Chun shun's property
at HongKong be in the province of Thwang Img
wad
said to
and not at Hongkong
and therefore a favourable judgment at Hongkong did not guarantee the payment of the claim and
expences. Chun shum adopted neither of these. three proposals.
Q..
Veither myself
nor the firm of Vogel Magedom vl through the medium of the I German Consulate
have ever
requested the Chimese anthorities to procente
to imprison
undle.
or
to retain in prison. Chun chin the
>
585
Canton the 28th April 1975
(signed) C. Lueder
Imperial Serman Consul
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.